Predictors of recovery in children aged 6–59 months with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition: a multicentre study (2024)

  • Journal List
  • Public Health Nutr
  • v.24(15); 2021 Oct
  • PMC11094385

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Predictors of recovery in children aged 6–59 months with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition: a multicentre study (1)

Link to Publisher's site

Public Health Nutr. 2021 Oct; 24(15): 4899–4907.

Published online 2020 Nov 23. doi:10.1017/S1368980020004723

PMCID: PMC11094385

PMID: 33222710

Sam Marconi David,1 Preethi N Ragasudha,Predictors of recovery in children aged 6–59 months with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition: a multicentre study (2)1,* Sunita Taneja,2 Sanjana Brahmawar Mohan,3 Sharad D Iyengar,4 Ruby Angeline Pricilla,1 Jose Martines,5 Harshpal Singh Sachdev,3 Virendra Suhalka,4 Venkata Raghava Mohan,1 Sarmila Mazumder,2 Ranadip Chowdhury,2 Rajiv Bahl,6 and Anuradha Bose1

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Abstract

Objective:

To identify predictors of recovery in children with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition (SAM).

Design:

This is a secondary data analysis from an individual randomised controlled trial, where children with uncomplicated SAM were randomised to three feeding regimens, namely ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) sourced from Compact India, locally prepared RUTF or augmented home-prepared foods, under two age strata (6–17 months and 18–59 months) for 16 weeks or until recovery. Three sets of predictors that could influence recovery, namely child, family and nutritional predictors, were analysed.

Setting:

Rural and urban slum areas of three states of India, namely Rajasthan, Delhi and Tamil Nadu.

Participants:

In total, 906 children (age: 6–59 months) were analysed to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) using the Cox proportional hazard ratio model to identify various predictors.

Results:

Being a female child (AHR: 1·269 (1·016, 1·584)), better employment status of the child’s father (AHR: 1·53 (1·197, 1·95)) and residence in a rental house (AHR: 1·485 (1·137, 1·94)) increased the chances of recovery. No hospitalisation (AHR: 1·778 (1·055, 2·997)), no fever, (AHR: 2·748 (2·161, 3·494)) and ≤ 2 episodes of diarrhoea (AHR: 1·579 (1·035, 2·412)) during the treatment phase; availability of community-based peer support to mothers for feeding (AHR: 1·61 (1·237, 2·097)) and a better weight-for-height Z-score (WHZ) at enrolment (AHR: 1·811 (1·297, 2·529)) predicted higher chances of recovery from SAM.

Conclusion:

The probability of recovery increases in children with better WHZ and with the initiation of treatment for acute illnesses to avoid hospitalisation, availability of peer support and better employment status of the father.

Keywords: Severe acute malnutrition, Ready-to-use therapeutic food, Predictors, Recovery

India has 57 million (more than a third) of the world’s 146 million undernourished children(1). In the 1990s, an effort was made to list malnutrition as an independent factor leading to child death. Later, malnutrition was found to be associated with 50 % of child deaths in developing nations(2,3). As a nation carrying over a third of the world’s malnourished children, implementing control measures against malnutrition is thus essential.

Identifying and treating severe acute malnutrition (SAM) begins with accurate diagnosis, and SAM is diagnosed on the basis of the following criteria: a weight-for-height Z-score (WHZ) of < −3SD, a mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) of < 115 mm and presence of bilateral oedema in children aged 6–59 months(4). Children with SAM often present with a medical condition or intercurrent illness, defined as complicated SAM, and require hospitalisation and treatment. However, in children with uncomplicated SAM, treatment may be through home-based management using ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF), which is associated with a better outcome than standard inpatient therapy(5,6). Control and prevention of this condition also involves investigating the factors influencing a child’s progression to malnutrition and determining their recovery, with recovery being defined as the attainment of a WHZ of ≥ −2SD and having no oedema for 2 weeks(7).

Studies have found that a child’s birth weight, family income and maternal breast-feeding can be positively and maternal unemployment can be negatively associated with nutritional recovery(8). Furthermore, parents’ higher education; exclusive breast-feeding for 6 months; proper weaning; immunisation; higher socio-economic status; environmental conditions such as proper housing, tap water supply and houses with latrines; lower birth order and small family size contribute to an improvement in the nutritional status of children(9). However, such associations are yet to be studied in the Indian context, where differences might exist due to differing presentations of SAM across regions, such as a lower prevalence of oedema (< 1 %) in Indian(10) children with SAM than in their African counterparts(11). Developing local data is essential to inform national policies on the need and means to control this situation and improve the nutritional status of children. Thus, the current study examines the potential role of socio-demographic, maternal, child-related and environmental factors as predictors of recovery among Indian children with uncomplicated SAM.

Methodology

The current study involves a secondary analysis of data from a previously conducted multicentre randomised control trial in India(12). The trial was conducted at three sites across India, namely urban slums and resettlement colonies in Delhi, rural (predominantly tribal) Rajasthan and rural and urban Tamil Nadu. The sites were located in areas where the SAM prevalence was reported to be above the national average of 6·4 %(13). In this randomised control trial, children aged 6–59 months with uncomplicated SAM were enrolled to assess the efficacy of three feeding regimens: commercially produced ready-to-use therapeutic food sourced from Compact India (RUTF-C); locally prepared RUTF (RUTF-L) made according to uniform specifications in production units at the three study sites and augmented home-prepared foods (A-HPF) for which raw ingredients were provided at 1·5 times the amounts required for the child in question. Study children were provided the intervention for 16 weeks or until recovery (treatment phase), whichever was earlier. The primary study objective was to evaluate the impact of the three feeding regimens. The composition of the feeding regimens and the details of their efficacy on the nutritional status on children with SAM have been described previously(12).

Two comparisons were made in the study: between RUTF-C and A-HPF and between RUTF-L and A-HPF; A-HPF was the comparison group. A 17–23 % difference in recovery between RUTF and a standard diet was reported by non-randomised studies conducted in Africa(1416). Therefore, a 15 % difference in recovery between the A-HPF (65 % recovery) and RUTF groups (80 % recovery) was hypothesised. With 90 % power and α = 0·025, a sample size of 231 children in each group was thus calculated. To account for the loss to follow-up, the sample size was increased by 10 %, resulting in a final sample size estimate of 765. Considering lower recovery rates, to preserve the power to test the a priori hypothesis of 15 % difference between the intervention and comparison groups, the Data Safety Monitoring Bureau proposed an increase in the sample size to at least 900 children(12).

Children aged 6–59 months were identified through a door-to-door survey of the defined study population. The selection criterion was a WHZ of < −3 SD. Only children with a MUAC of ≤ 130 mm(17) were brought to the study clinic for the assessment of their WHZ using WHO Anthro software. A physician evaluated the children and classified them as those with complicated or uncomplicated SAM based on the WHZ of < −3SD, irrespective of the MUAC value. Children who were severely malnourished and had medical complications according to the WHO guidelines(18), such as a Hb level of < 6 g/dl, allergy to milk, unable to consume the test feed (failed appetite test) and clinical features of infection, were referred for hospital admission and treatment. Those who did not present with any of the listed symptoms of complicated SAM and passed an appetite test were enrolled after obtaining informed consent from the parents. The children were then classified into two strata on the basis of age: stratum 1 (6–17 months) and stratum 2 (18–59 months) and randomised to one of the three aforementioned intervention groups.

A total of 106 935 children between 6 and 59 months were identified at the three sites. Of these, 6815 (6·4 %) children who had a MUAC of < 130 mm were referred to the study clinic, and of the 5103 (74·9 %) children who came to the study clinic, 1190 (23 %) had SAM (WHZ < –3). Children having a medical complication were referred to a hospital (n 292) and were revisited approximately after a month to ascertain the resolution of complications. In total, 98 of the children referred to the hospital were enrolled after they recovered from the illness and were available at home.

Nine hundred and six children with uncomplicated SAM were enrolled in the study after excluding those who presented with complications, whose family was planning to move out of the study area during the study period, that is, within 4 months, failed to consent or had a sibling enrolled (if there were two children in a family with SAM, only the one with a more severe form of SAM was enrolled). Data pertaining to the demographic profile, family details, breast-feeding practices and complementary feeding practices were collected using structured questionnaires for interviewing primary caregivers. A trained anthropometry team recorded anthropometric measurements at enrolment.

During the treatment phase, a trained anthropometry team, blinded to the treatment allocation of the child, took weekly anthropometric measurements as well as collected morbidity details regarding diarrhoea, fever, acute lower respiratory infections (ALRI) and hospitalisation, if any. WHO Anthro software was used to determine the child’s nutritional status as SD for WHZ, weight-for-age Z-score (WAZ) and height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) according to the WHO standards. After completion of the treatment phase, the study team facilitated linkages between the families and government-run Anganwadi centres, where supplementary food is provided under the Integrated Child Development Services scheme. This was performed over the next 16 weeks (sustenance phase), and the child was then censored from the study.

Outcome measurement

Children were classified as recovered if they had a WHZ of ≥ −2SD and no oedema for two consecutive weeks and not recovered if they had a WHZ of < −2SD and/or oedema(7). Treatment with the feeding regimen ceased after recovery or at week 16 after recruitment. Children who did not recover were evaluated by the physician for any underlying illness, and the study team facilitated linkages between the families of these children and the local Anganwadi centres.

Description of variables

The variables collected were child-related predictors, parental and family-related predictors and nutritional and anthropometric predictors.

Gender, birth weight, birth order, age of the child at enrolment and number of episodes of diarrhoea, ALRI and hospitalisations during the treatment phase were considered under child-related predictors of recovery.

Under parental and family-related predictors of recovery, mother’s age, education and occupation; mother’s BMI (based on WHO classification), father’s education and occupation, residence ownership (owned or rental), family structure (nuclear (pair of adults living with their children) or joint family (more than one pair of adults living with their children)), family size, number of living children, additional family support (additional caregiver such as aunt or grandparents apart from the mother) and peer support (workers who visited the children’s home several times a day to help caregivers feed their children with the allocated intervention food) were included.

Nutritional and anthropometric predictors of recovery included breast-feeding up to 6 months, a feeding regimen used for home-based treatment, weight gain in gram per kilogram of body weight and anthropometric parameters (WHZ, WAZ, HAZ and MUAC).

Definitions

Diarrhoea: Three or more watery stools in a 24-h period. An episode is considered new if the individual’s bowel movements are normal in the 48 h prior to symptom presentation(19).

Acute lower respiratory infection: The presence of cough or breathing difficulties and either fast breathing or lower chest indrawing. Two episodes are separated by a symptom-free interval of 15 d(19).

Fever: The presence of an axillary temperature of more than 37·5 °C(19).

Hospitalisation: If the child was admitted to a hospital for reasons other than the consequences of malnutrition during the treatment phase.

Improved water and toilet source: According to the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for water supply and sanitation, a sanitation facility is classified as suitable/improved if it consists of a flush toilet, a piped sewer system, a septic tank, a flush/pour flush to pit latrine, a ventilated improved pit latrine, a pit latrine with a slab or a composting toilet. Similarly, a household’s water source is considered as improved, if the source is a public tap, tube well or borehole, water piped into the dwelling or yard, a protected dug well, a protected spring or rainwater(20).

Breast-feeding: This was classified as exclusive breast-feeding (breast-feeding present, no solids and no liquids), predominant breast-feeding (breast-feeding present, clear liquids (water, fruit juice), no solids and no animal milk or formula feed) and partial breast-feeding (breast-feeding with solids, animal milk and/or formula feed) on the basis of breast-feeding habits during the child’s first 6 months(21).

Statistical methods

Quantitative statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 20.00 software. Continuous variables were expressed in terms of mean (sd) or median (inter-quartile range (IQR)). Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Bivariate analysis was performed using the χ2 test for dichotomous variables to know the association between dependent and predictor variables. The mean difference in WHZ between male and female children was assessed using Student’s unpaired t test. Based on the conceptual model, all variables were included to identify independent predictors of recovery. A multivariate COX proportional model was used to measure the hazard ratio and adjusted hazard ratio (AHR). Variables with a hazard ratio of more than 1, with a P value of < 0·05, signified predictor variables.

Results

The present study recruited a total of 906 children across all the three sites, of which 855 (94·4 %) children completed the treatment phase (Table ​(Table1).1). The children were from both rural and urban areas. At the end of the treatment phase or during the treatment phase, 420 (46·4 %) children recovered from SAM, having attained a WHZ of ≥ –2SD. Among the recovered children, time (median) to recover was 5 (IQR 3–9) weeks. At enrolment, the mean age of recovered children was 24·27 (sd 13·8) months, whereas that of not-recovered children was 26·37 (sd 13·9) months. None of the children had bilateral pitting oedema. Based on their age, children were stratified into two groups, namely 6–17 months and 18–59 months, and randomisation was performed separately for both groups. However, further analysis for identifying the predictors of recovery from SAM was not performed on the basis of stratification.

Table 1

Demographic and anthropometric characteristics of study children and parents at the time of recruitment

Recovered (n 420)Not recovered (n 486)
Characteristicn%n%
Age at enrolment in months
Mean24·2726·37
sd13·813·9
Median2022
IQR14–3216–38
Sex
Male22653·829961·5
Female19446·218738·5
Religion
Hindu33980·739781·7
Muslim7116·96613·6
Christian92·1183·7
Others10·251·02
Treatment group
A-HPF1222917936·8
RUTF-C13331·716534·0
RUTF-L16539·314229·2
Breast feeding
Exclusively breastfed13632·418437·9
Predominantly breastfed9322·111022·7
Partially breastfed19045·218437·9
No breast-feeding10·271·4
Anthropometry
Height-for-age Z-score at enrolment
Mean−3·00−3·00
sd1·421·21
Weight-for-height Z-score at enrolment
Mean−3·28−3·45
sd0·390·45
MUAC
Mean11·7911·87
sd0·870·70
Mother’s age%%
< 18 years20·50
18–25 years17943·122245·8
26–30 years14735·416133·2
>30 years872110221
Mother’s education
Up to primary20353·824355
Secondary school7519·97917·9
High school6216·47717·4
Higher secondary school246·4296·6
College and above133·4143·2
Father’s education
Up to primary17441·519540·5
Secondary school9622·912626·1
High school9522·711523·9
Higher secondary school378·8296
College and above174·1173·5

Open in a separate window

IQR, inter-quartile range; AHPF, augmented home prepared food; RUTF-C, centrally produced ready-to-use therapeutic food; RUTF-L, locally prepared ready-to-use therapeutic food.

In the current study, recovery was observed 1·27 times more among the female children, and this association was statistically significant (P = 0·036) even after adjusting for all other variables in the model (Table ​(Table2).2). At enrolment, the mean WHZ among the male and female children was –3·42 and –3·33, respectively. The mean difference between the WHZ for the male and female children was –0·087 (P = 0·002). Other birth-related factors, such as birth order, and age at enrolment exhibited no association with recovery among the children (P = 0·819 and P = 0·248, respectively).

Table 2

Predictors of recovery among children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in the age group of 6–59 months*,

RecoveredNot recoveredCrude HRAdjusted HRP-value
Variablen%n%OR95 % CIOR95 % CI
Gendern 420n 486
Female19446·118738·41·2381·021, 1·4991·2691·016, 1·5840·036
Age in months§n 420n 486
17 and less18143·118638·3 %1·2210·936, 1·5941·1960·946, 1·5120·134
Mother’s agen 415n 485
25 and less18143·622245·8 %0·9850·812, 1·1961·0340·822, 1·2990·777
Mother’s Education (grade)n 377n 442
9th and above9926·212027·10·9070·721, 1·1410·7730·586, 1·020·069
Mother’s occupationn 411n 481
Do not work outside the house26263·730362·91·0510·859, 1·2850·8660·663, 1·130·29
Mother’s BMIn 393n 460
> 18·520953·122448·61·1300·927, 1·3780·9650·764, 1·220·768
Father’s education (grade)n 419n 482
11th and above5412·8469·51·1230·844, 1·4950·990·7, 1·40·954
Father’s occupationn 418n 484
Employed22453·523748·91·1380·939, 1·3791·531·197, 1·9550·001
Family sizen 420n 485
≤ 414835·216333·61·0840·887, 1·3240·8890·698, 1·1330·343
Residencen 420n 482
Rental house15737·3145301·3501·107, 1·6451·4851·137, 1·940·004
Exclusive breast feedingn 420n 486
Yes13632·318437·80·8630·703, 1·0580·9890·759, 1·2880·933
Predominantly breast-feedingn 420n 486
Yes9322·111022·60·9800·779, 1·2340·9550·71, 1·2840·761
Additional family support to look after the childn 420n 485
No18844·817035·11·5021·149, 1·9631·2330·956, 1·590·106
Peer supportn 420n 486
Yes26863·824450·21·4651·200, 1·7871·611·237, 2·097< 0·001
Improved sanitationn 415n 482
Yes22554·222847·31·2361·019, 1·5001·1810·896, 1·5580·238
Improved watern 420n 482
Yes38491·444592·30·880·625, 1·2380·7960·533, 1·1890·265
Hospitalisation§n 420n 486
No40195·442186·62·8921·825, 4·5831·7781·055, 2·9970·031
Diarrhoeal Episodes§n 372n 382
≤ two34592·733487·31·8711·264, 2·7691·5791·035, 2·4120·034
ALRI episodes§n 372n 381
≤ one36898·9366963·1071·160, 8·3242·5010·919, 6·810·073
Fever§n 372n 382
No19552·49725·43·2372·380, 4·4022·7482·161, 3·494< 0·001
Weight-for-height Z-score||n 419Min–maxn 486Min–maxMin–maxMin-max
Median−3·17–5·75– 2·32−3·35–5·68–2·622·3311·745–3·1141·8111·297–2·529< 0·001

Open in a separate window

*All variables are dichotomised variables except weight-for-height Z-score at the time on enrolment; crude hazard ratio (95 % CI) calculated using bivariate Cox-proportional hazard model.

All variables in Table ​Table22 were included in the regression analysis. Adjusted Hazard Ratio and corresponding P value were calculated using multivariate Cox-proportional hazard model; ALRI, acute lower respiratory infection; IQR, inter-quartile range.

Significant P value.

§During treatment phase.

||At the time of enrolment.

No fever (AHR: 2·748 (2·161, 3·494)), ≤ 2 episodes of diarrhoea (AHR: 1·579 (1·035, 2·412)), and no hospitalisation (AHR: 1·778 (1·055, 2·997)) during the treatment phase had a significant association with recovery. Fewer episodes (≤ 1) of ALRI had no significant association with recovery.

Parental factors such as parents’ education, mother’s occupation, BMI and age were not identified as significant predictors of recovery from SAM. However, father’s occupation (AHR: 1·53 (1·197, 1·955)) was significantly associated with recovery even after adjusting for other variables in the model (Table ​(Table2).2). Interestingly, the residential status of the children’s parents was significantly associated with recovery among the children. Children staying in a rental house exhibited a positive association (AHR: 1·485 (1·137, 1·94)) with recovery. Nuclear family status (up to 4 people) also showed no association with recovery.

Among the study children, no statistically significant association was observed between additional family support and recovery (P = 0·106). Community-based feeding/caregiver support (peer support) was found to be a significant predictor of recovery (AHR: 1·61 (1·237, 2·097)) in the current study. Usage of improved water for consumption or improved sanitation showed no association with recovery. Similarly, no significant association was observed between exclusive/predominant breast-feeding and recovery among the children.

Of the various anthropometric measurements included in the study, WHZ at enrolment was significantly associated with recovery from SAM. Higher WHZ at enrolment increased the chances of recovery, which was statistically significant (AHR: 1·811 (1·297, 2·529)).

Discussion

Although there are various ongoing programmes for improving the nutritional status of children, SAM remains a global burden in many low- and middle-income countries such as India(22). However, little information is available on the predictors of recovery from uncomplicated SAM. In the current study, we examined numerous factors that may have a role in predicting the recovery of children from uncomplicated SAM. The present study was conducted in urban and rural populations of India and identified a few major factors that could predict the recovery of children with uncomplicated SAM. The predictors included being a female child, higher WHZ at the time of initiation of intervention, fewer/no episodes of diarrhoea or fever, no hospitalisation during the treatment phase, availability of peer support for the mothers during the intervention, living in a rental house, and employed father.

However, many factors already reported to act as predictors (such as age and educational status of parents) were found to have no association with prediction of recovery from SAM in the present study. A study conducted in Southern Ethiopia reported that age and breast-feeding were not significant predictors of recovery from SAM(22). Similar to studies conducted in Kenya(23) and India(24), the present study showed that age at enrolment was not a significant predictor of recovery. Exclusive or predominant breast-feeding too was not found to be a significant predictor. In the present study, 35 % of the children were exclusively breastfed for 6 months. However, a cohort study conducted in urban Vellore, India, reported that only 22 % of children were exclusively breastfed for 4 months and only 1 % of children were exclusively breastfed for 6 months(25). This is in line with the findings of other studies conducted in several developing countries that have failed to find any significant association between exclusive breast-feeding and stunting, wasting, and children being underweight(2628).

In a study conducted in Bangladesh, the chance of recovery was higher among male children(29), which contradicts our study findings. However, our results are consistent with those of a study conducted in a North-West Ethiopia, where recovery was higher among female children(22). A reason for these differences could be a significantly lower WHZ for male children than for female children at study enrolment.

Epidemiological studies have shown that diarrhoea affects the physical growth of a child(30). For instance, through a meta-analysis, Khalil et al. reported that diarrhoea due to Cryptosporidium infection affects childhood health by decreasing the growth rate(31). Our study results are consistent with these results as those who had fewer episodes (≤ 2) of diarrhoea during the treatment phase had a higher chance of recovery. The aforementioned finding is also in accordance with that of a case–control study conducted in Ghana, which reported that in 6 months, malnourished children had > 2 episodes of diarrhoea than children who were not malnourished(32).

The present study showed that hospital admission for other morbidities can adversely affect the nutritional status of children(33). Very few studies have assessed whether hospital admission affects nutritional recovery from SAM. This could be because most studies enrolled children who were already admitted to the hospital. The study conducted by Desyibelew et al. reported a direct relationship between prolonged hospital stays and nutritional recovery(22). A similar relationship was observed in the present study, with no hospitalisation due to other morbidities during the treatment phase being identified as a significant predictor of recovery from SAM.

According to a study conducted in rural Karnataka, India, preschool children who had recurrent cough and cold were independently associated with malnutrition(34). This is not consistent with our study results, which showed neither the presence nor the absence of ALRI during the treatment phase being associated with recovery. The absence of fever during the treatment phase showed a significantly positive association with recovery in our study, which contradicts the results of a study conducted in Ethiopia where fever was not associated with recovery from SAM(35).

Community-based educational support (peer support) to mothers can increase the motivation to follow any health practice. Studies have shown that educational support to the caregiver of the children can improve the nutritional status of the children(12,36,37). Here, peer support during the treatment phase showed a positive association, even after adjusting for other variables in the model.

A study conducted in rural Ethiopia among malnourished children showed that drinking water from an improved water source and using improved sanitation are predictors of recovery from malnutrition(38). In our study, both improved water and improved sanitation were not found to act as predictors of recovery from SAM.

Among the various socio-economic factors, parents’ education is considered one of the most crucial factors that can predict malnutrition. Various studies have demonstrated that parents’ literacy improves the nutritional status of children(39,40). On the contrary, our study showed that neither the mother’s (above 8th grade) nor the father’s (above 10th grade) education was associated with recovery of their children. Another factor of interest is the employment status of the children’s parents. Mothers’ gainful (monetary) employment (i.e. when mothers could spend more time with the children) was not a good predictor of recovery. However, fathers’ gainful employment (i.e. when fathers were financially stable enough to provide food) was found to be a good predictor of recovery in the current study. A study conducted in rural Ethiopia showed lower chances of recovery among children with mothers having a heavy work index(40), which is more self-explanatory when compared with our study findings. Surprisingly, living in a rental house is a predictor of recovery. A possible explanation could be that families felt the need to work sufficiently so as to produce/earn enough to pay rent. Therefore, their cash flow may not be limited, and hence may not impact the food provided.

Limitations

A major limitation of our study was the unavailability of a few data parameters. Studies have shown that birth weight is directly associated with recovery from SAM. Unfortunately, we could not investigate this association due to incomplete data (approximately 50 %) on birth weight. Vaccination coverage was also not studied for the same reason. Because the analysis emerged from a randomised control trial conducted under a controlled setting, the findings may not be generalisable. Moreover, the current study did not investigate the predictors of recurrence of malnutrition in later stages of childhood because long-term follow-up of the study children was not conducted.

Conclusion

For children with SAM, having fewer episodes of diarrhoea, no hospitalisation for other morbidities during the treatment phase, better WHZ at the time of initiation of treatment, along with a better employment status of the father and availability of peer support could provide higher chances of recovery. Notably, the improved chances of recovery for children having higher WHZ emphasises the need for the early identification of children with SAM and provision of appropriate nutritional interventions before any further deterioration in their scores. Furthermore, the identified predictive factors could help researchers and even policymakers to develop a follow-up protocol for the community management of children with SAM.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank all the study participants and field staff for their time and involvement with the study. Financial support: The trial was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant number OPP1033634). Conflict of interest: None Authorship: All authors contributed substantially to the design and undertaking of the study, its analyses and writing of the manuscript. S.B.M., A.B., S.D.I., J.M., N.B. and R.B. designed the study. N.B. and S.T. coordinated the study with technical support from R.B. and J.M. The following were responsible for the day-to-day implementation: S.B.M., S.M. and H.S.S. (Delhi); A.B., P.N.R., R.A.P. and V.R.M. (Vellore) and S.D.I. and V.S. (Udaipur). S.M.D. did the data analyses and wrote the manuscript with P.N.R. and R.C. P.N.R. affirms that the manuscript is an honest, accurate and transparent account of the study and that no important aspects of the study have been omitted. Ethics of human subject participation: Ethical approval obtained from Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi; Christian Medical College, Vellore; Action Research and Training for Health, Udaipur and the WHO Ethics Review Committee. The current study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving research study participants were approved by the Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi; Christian Medical College, Vellore; Action Research and Training for Health, Udaipur and the WHO Ethics Review Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Collaborators: Other members of the Study Group. SAS: Nita Bhandari, Sowmya Prakash, Rimpi Kaushik, Gunjan Aggarwal, Rajkumari Suchitra, Priti Sharma. CMC: Kuryan George, Jasmine Helan Prasad, Venkatesan Sankarapandian. ARTH: Kirti Iyengar, Anandilal Sharma, Anjana Verma, Ashutosh Sharma, Trupti Patel, Priya Krishnan, Satyanarayan Panchal, Hitesh Rawal. Coordination Unit: Kiran Bhatia, Girish Chand Pant, Medha Shekhar.

References

1. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (2005) GOI: NFHS-3 Volume 1. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FRIND3/00FrontMatter00.pdf (accessed December 2017).

2. Bulletin of the World Health Organization (2000) Malnutrition as an underlying cause of childhood deaths associated with infectious diseases in developing countries. http://www.who.int/bulletin/archives/78(10)1207.pdf (accessed December 2017). [PMC free article] [PubMed]

3. Pelletier DL, Frongillo EA, Schroeder DGet al. (1994) A methodology for estimating the contribution of malnutrition to child mortality in developing countries. J Nutr124, 2106S–2122S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. World Health Organization & United Nations Children’s Fund (2009) WHO child growth standards and the identification of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children: A Joint Statement by the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund. Geneva: World Health Organization and UNICEF; available at http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/severemalnutrition/9789241598163_eng.pdf (accessed December 2017). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Ashworth A (2006) Efficacy and effectiveness of community-based treatment of severe malnutrition. Food Nutr Bull27, S24–S48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Ciliberto MA, Sandige H, Ndekha MJet al. (2005) Comparison of home-based therapy with ready-to-use therapeutic food with standard therapy in the treatment of malnourished Malawian children: a controlled, clinical effectiveness trial. Am J Clin Nutr81, 864–870. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. World Health Organization (2013) Guideline: updates on the management of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children. https://www.who.int/publications-detail/9789241506328 (accessed May 2020). [PubMed]

8. Goulart RMM, França Júnior I & Souza MD (2009) Factors associated to child nutritional recovery in a supplemental feeding program. Rev Bras Epidemiol12, 180–94. [Google Scholar]

9. Bhavsar SP & Kulkarni R (2012) Maternal and environmental factors affecting the nutritional status of children in Mumbai urban slum. Int J Sci and Res Publ2, 1–9. [Google Scholar]

10. Alka M, Geetanjali T, Sonia Met al. (2018) Burden of severe acute malnutrition in under-five children (2–59 months) admitted in a tertiary care hospital of Delhi. J Trop Pediatr64, 45–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Jose Luis A, Nicky D, Lauren Bet al. (2016) Putting Child Kwashiorkor on the Map. http://www.ennonline.net/childkwashiorkor (accessed December 2017).

12. Bhandari N, Mohan SB, Bose Aet al. (2016) Efficacy of three feeding regimens for home-based management of children with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition: a randomised trial in India. BMJ Glob Health1, e000144. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Burza S, Mahajan R, Marino Eet al. (2015) Community-based management of severe acute malnutrition in India: new evidence from Bihar. Am J Clin Nutr101, 847–859. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Ciliberto MA, Sandige H, Ndekha MJet al. (2005) Comparison of home-based therapy with ready-to-use therapeutic food with standard therapy in the treatment of malnourished Malawian children: a controlled, clinical effectiveness trial. Am J Clin Nutr81, 864–870. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Manary MJ, Ndkeha MJ, Ashorn Pet al. (2004) Home based therapy for severe malnutrition with ready-to-use food. Arch Dis Child89, 557–561. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Ndekha MJ, Manary MJ, Ashorn Pet al. (2005) Home-based therapy with ready-to-use therapeutic food is of benefit to malnourished, HIV-infected Malawian children. Acta Paediatr94, 222–225. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Laillou A, Prak S, de Groot Ret al. (2014) Optimal screening of children with acute malnutrition requires a change in current WHO guidelines as MUAC and WHZ identify different patient groups. PLOS ONE9, e101159. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. World Health Organisation (2016) Severe Acute Malnutrition update: current WHO guidelines and the WHO Essential Medicine list for children. https://www.who.int/selection_medicines/committees/expert/21/applications/s6_paed_antibiotics_appendix7_sam.pdf?ua=1 (accessed August 2020).

19. Richard SA, Barrett LJ, Guerrant RLet al. (2014) Disease surveillance methods used in the 8-Site MAL-ED cohort study. Clin Infect Dis59, S220–S224. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. WHO/UNICEF (2006) Core questions on drinking-water and sanitation for household surveys. https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/monitoring/oms_brochure_core_questionsfinal24608.pdf (accessed August 2019).

21. Patil CL, Ambikapath R, Turab Aet al. (2015). Early interruption of exclusive breastfeeding: results from the eight-country MAL-ED study. J Health Popul Nutr34, 10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Desyibelew HD, Fekadu A & Woldie H (2017) Recovery rate and associated factors of children age 6–59 months admitted with severe acute malnutrition at inpatient unit of Bahir Dar Felege Hiwot Referral hospital therapeutic feeding unite, Northwest Ethiopia. PLOS ONE12, e0171020. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Talbert A, Thuo N, Karisa Jet al. (2012) Diarrhoea complicating severe acute malnutrition in kenyan children: a prospective descriptive study of risk factors and outcome. PLOS ONE7, e38321. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Taneja G, Dixit S, Khatri Aet al. (2012) A study to evaluate the effect of nutritional intervention measures on admitted children in selected nutrition rehabilitation centers of Indore and Ujjain Divisions of the state of Madhya Pradesh (India). Indian J Community Med Off Publ Indian Assoc Prev Soc Med37, 107–115. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Reddy NS, Sindhu KN, Ramanujam Ket al. (2019) Exclusive breastfeeding practices in an urban settlement of Vellore, southern India: findings from the MAL-ED birth cohort. Int Breastfeed J14, 29. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Brown KH, Creed-Kanashiro H & Dewey KG (1995) Optimal complementary feeding practices to prevent childhood malnutrition in developing countries. Food Nutr Bull16, 320–339. [Google Scholar]

27. Ayisi R & Wakoli A (2014) Exclusive breastfeeding practice: its implication on nutrition status, growth and morbidity pattern among infants aged 0–6 months. GJBAHS3, 254–258. [Google Scholar]

28. Khan MN & Islam MM (2017) Effect of exclusive breastfeeding on selected adverse health and nutritional outcomes: a nationally representative study. BMC Public Health17, 889. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Ahmed AU, Ahmed TU, Uddin MSet al. (2013) Outcome of standardized case management of under-5 children with severe acute malnutrition in three hospitals of Dhaka City in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Child Health37, 5–13. [Google Scholar]

30. Patwari AK (1999) Diarrhoea and malnutrition interaction. Indian J Pediatr66, S124–S134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Khalil IA, Troeger C, Rao PCet al. (2018) Morbidity, mortality, and long-term consequences associated with diarrhoea from Cryptosporidium infection in children younger than 5 years: a meta-analyses study. Lancet Glob Health6, e758–e768. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Tette EM, Sifah EK & Nartey ET (2015). Factors affecting malnutrition in children and the uptake of interventions to prevent the condition. BMC Pediatr15, 189. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

33. Allard JP, Keller H, Jeejeebhoy KNet al. (2016) Decline in nutritional status is associated with prolonged length of stay in hospitalised patients admitted for 7 days or more: a prospective cohort study. Clin Nutr35, 144–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

34. Nayak BS, Unnikrishnan B, George Aet al. (2018) Risk factors for malnutrition among preschool children in rural Karnataka: a case-control study. BMC Public Health18, 283. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

35. Gebremichael DY (2015) Predictors of nutritional recovery time and survival status among children with severe acute malnutrition who have been managed in therapeutic feeding centers, Southern Ethiopia: retrospective cohort study. BMC Public Health15, 1267. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

36. Dearden KA, Hilton S, Bentley MEet al. (2009) Caregiver verbal encouragement increases food acceptance among vietnamese toddlers. J Nutr139, 1387–1392. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

37. Vazir S, Engle P, Balakrishna Net al. (2013) Cluster-randomized trial on complementary and responsive feeding education to caregivers found improved dietary intake, growth and development among rural Indian toddlers. Matern Child Nutr9, 99–117. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

38. James P, Sadler K, Wondafrash Met al. (2016) Children with moderate acute malnutrition with no access to supplementary feeding programmes experience high rates of deterioration and no improvement: results from a prospective cohort study in rural Ethiopia. PLOS ONE11, e0153530. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

39. Khattak UK, Iqbal SP & Ghazanfar H (2017) The role of parents’ literacy in malnutrition of children under the age of five years in a semi-urban community of Pakistan: a case-control study. Cureus9, e1316. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

40. Kunwar R & Pillai P (2002) Impact of education of parents on nutritional status of primary school children. Med J Armed Forces India58, 38–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

Predictors of recovery in children aged 6–59 months with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition: a multicentre study (2024)

FAQs

What is severe acute malnutrition in children under 6 months? ›

Severe acute malnutrition in infants who are 0–5 months of age is defined as: weight-for-length <–3 Z-scores of the WHO Child Growth Standards median, or. presence of bilateral pitting oedema.

What are the predictors of malnutrition? ›

Although fever, diarrhoea, sex and age of the child, household size and access to foods were significant predictors of malnutrition, the strongest association was observed between all three indicators of malnutrition and the enhanced vegetation index.

How long does it take the body to recover from malnutrition? ›

The median time to recovery from severe acute malnutrition was 15 days (95% CI 14, 15). The highest incidence of recovery was observed at 15–20 days (20.06 per 100 child days' observations) followed by 20–25 days (13.63 per 100 child days' observations).

What is the recovery rate for severe acute malnutrition? ›

Results: The successful recovery rate for severe acute malnourished children admitted to outpatient therapeutic program was 74.2% (95% CI: 69.3, 78.6). False recovery, death, default, non-responder and medical transfer out rates were 12.6%, 8.6%, 2.9%, 0.9% and 0.9%, respectively.

What are the 3 criteria for severe acute malnutrition? ›

Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM)

Severe acute malnutrition is defined by very low weight-for-height/length (Z- score below -3 SD of the median WHO child growth standards), or a mid-upper arm circumference < 115 mm, or by the presence of nutritional oedema. Severe Acute Malnutrition is both a medical and social disorder.

What age is malnutrition most damaging? ›

Nearly half of deaths among children under 5 years of age are linked to undernutrition. These mostly occur in low- and middle-income countries.

What are the predictors of malnutrition among children? ›

Child's gender, age, birth size, preceding birth order, anaemia status, maternal education, work status, body weight, household wealth status, number of bedrooms were among individual/household predictors of malnutrition.

What are the 4 indicators of malnutrition? ›

At least two of the following four indicators are required to diagnose malnutrition: weight gain velocity (for children aged <2 years), weight loss (for those aged >2 years), deceleration in weight-for-length/BMI-for-age Z-score, and inadequate nutrient intake [18].

What are the 6 indicators of malnutrition? ›

3.2. Criteria selected for malnutrition diagnosis
  • Weight loss.
  • Low body mass index (BMI)
  • Reduced muscle mass.
  • Reduced food intake or assimilation.
  • Disease burden/inflammation.
Mar 28, 2019

Can the brain recover from malnutrition? ›

We now know that most of the alterations in the growth of various brain structures eventually recover (to some extent), although permanent alterations in the hippocampus and cerebellum remain.

Can malnutrition cause permanent damage? ›

It is very harmful to children because it affects brain development and other growth. Children who suffer from malnutrition may have lifelong problems.

Can your organs shut down from malnutrition? ›

What happens to the body during starvation? The body runs on the energy provided by the calories in the food we eat. When you stop eating, your body starts to break down its own tissues for food, disrupting all the vital processes of your systems. This results in severe weight loss and leads to organ failure.

Can you recover from extreme malnutrition? ›

A total of 176(75.9%) children recovered from severe acute malnutrition.

What are the two types of severe acute malnutrition? ›

Marasmus and kwashiorkor are common terms historically used to differentiate between types of SAM. Marasmus refers to children who are very thin for their height (that is, they meet the WHZ or MUAC cutoff) but do not have bilateral pitting edema; kwashiorkor refers to edematous malnutrition.

How do you fix severe malnutrition? ›

In most patients with malnutrition the intake of protein, carbohydrates, water, minerals and vitamins need to be gradually increased. Supplements of vitamins and minerals are often advised. Those with protein energy malnutrition may need to take protein bars or supplements for correction of the deficiency.

What is severe acute malnutrition seen in children and infants? ›

In children who are 6–59 months of age, severe acute malnutrition is defined by a very low weight-for-height/weight-for-length, or clinical signs of bilateral pitting oedema, or a very low mid-upper arm circumference.

What is infants with severe malnutrition? ›

Child with severe acute malnutrition oedema
  • shock: lethargic or unconscious; with cold hands, slow capillary refill (> 3 s), or weak (low volume), rapid pulse and low blood pressure.
  • signs of dehydration.
  • severe palmar pallor.
  • bilateral pitting oedema.
  • eye signs of vitamin A deficiency: –

What is severe acute malnutrition in children? ›

Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) results from insufficient energy (kilocalories), fat, protein and/or other nutrients (vitamins and minerals, etc.) to cover individual needs. SAM is frequently associated with medical complications due to metabolic disturbances and compromised immunity.

What is the diagnostic criteria for severe acute malnutrition in children? ›

Infants and children who are 6–59 months of age and have a mid-upper arm circumference <115 mm, or a weight-for-height/length <–3 Z-scores of the WHO Child Growth Standards median, or have bilateral pitting oedema, should be referred for full assessment at a treatment centre for the management of severe acute ...

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Rob Wisoky

Last Updated:

Views: 5441

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (68 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Rob Wisoky

Birthday: 1994-09-30

Address: 5789 Michel Vista, West Domenic, OR 80464-9452

Phone: +97313824072371

Job: Education Orchestrator

Hobby: Lockpicking, Crocheting, Baton twirling, Video gaming, Jogging, Whittling, Model building

Introduction: My name is Rob Wisoky, I am a smiling, helpful, encouraging, zealous, energetic, faithful, fantastic person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.